Madison Sieg vs Kate Fakih Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Oct at 11:34 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sieg vs K. Fakih

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sieg 1 - 0 Fakih
They have played 2 sets in total, with Madison Sieg winning 2 and Kate Fakih winning 0. The last match between Madison Sieg and Kate Fakih was at the W35 Redding, 07-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Madison Sieg getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sieg | 1 |
| Fakih | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Redding(10-07-25)
M. Sieg vs K. Fakih H2H Profile
M. Sieg vs K. Fakih Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Kate Fakih has an edge, winning 41.54% of points compared to Madison Sieg's 39.16%.
- Who dominates the return game? Fakih leads slightly in second serve returns with 50.82%, but Sieg excels in first serve returns with 37.13%.
- Under pressure, Fakih is more resilient, saving 60.42% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Sieg's 42.86%.
- On the overall performance front over the last year, Fakih has a marginally better win rate of 50.00%, compared to Sieg’s 44.44%.
- Analyzing their best surfaces, both players have a 58% win rate on their preferred surfaces, with Fakih on hard and Sieg on indoor hard.
- Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Fakih has a higher win rate at this level (53.85% compared to Sieg’s 44.44%).
- Head-to-head, Sieg has been dominant, winning their only match convincingly against Fakih in straight sets.
- The level of competition faced over the last year suggests Fakih has played against stronger opponents, averaging a ranking of 315.57 against Sieg’s 391.22.
- Deciding set performance is almost even, with Fakih having a slight edge, winning 50% of deciding sets compared to Sieg’s 47%.
- Both players should be evaluated based on their performance in the current event, as this can provide insight into recent form beyond historical statistics.
Editorial Prediction (October 7, 2025, UTC):
As we look forward to the match between Kate Fakih and Madison Sieg, the statistics provide a clear picture of strengths and weaknesses. Fakih appears to have a slight advantage on her second serve performance and in handling pressure situations as evidenced by her superior breakpoint saving capability. Her experience against tougher opponents and higher success rate in deciding sets also give her an edge.
Madison Sieg, however, has demonstrated her prowess in returning first serves, which could prove crucial during the match. Her previous success against Fakih can't be overlooked, given her decisive victory in their past encounter. Still, Sieg's lesser success rate in key performance areas like second serve points and against higher-ranked players suggests potential vulnerabilities.
In light of these factors, while both players have considerable strengths, Kate Fakih seems more likely to secure the victory in their upcoming match, leveraging her overall edge in current and past performance metrics.
Madison Sieg vs Kate Fakih Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Sieg vs K. Fakih H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:24:22 | Average Match Time | 1:24:22 |
| 50% (21/42) | 1st Serve % | 53% (32/60) |
| 90% (19/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (19/32) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 55% (33/60) | Return Points Win % | 29% (12/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Sieg Recent Matches Played
K. Fakih Recent Matches Played

M. Sieg vs K. Fakih Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.30% (121/106) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.86% (29/22) |
| 51.56% (264/248) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.88% (62/47) |
| 50.39% (2319/2283) | Games Win/Loss | 52.97% (518/460) |
| 53.17% (67/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (24/16) |
| 53.75% (43/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 52.38% (11/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 255 | Aces Total | 58 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 775 | Total Double Faults | 194 |
| 1:43:11 | Average Match Time | 1:29:26 |
| 451.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.22 |
| 63% (8779/13996) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1754/2729) |
| 59% (5209/8779) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1077/1754) |
| 45% (2341/5217) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (417/975) |
| 48% (891/1844) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (170/349) |
| 46% (6622/14334) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1255/2684) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.30% (99/94) | Challenger W/L | 52.94% (18/16) |
| 68.75% (22/10) | Futures W/L | 64.71% (11/6) |
| 53% (118/222) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (28/49) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (20/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 61% (36/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 90% (115/103) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (29/27) |
| 10% (115/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (29/2) |
| 16% (112/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (22/2) |